Might Europe’s Protection Stand Alone?

(Analysis) Could Europe defend itself without the United States? On March 9, 2025, Elon Musk, a key Trump administration advisor, suggested a U.S. exit from NATO, arguing on X that America shouldn’t “fund Europe’s defense”.

The call, echoing Republican skepticism, lands amid a transatlantic rift—U.S. tariffs, talks of seizing Greenland, and a UN vote against condemning Russia—unseen since NATO’s 1949 founding. With the U.S. hinting at retreat after 75 years as the alliance’s backbone, Europe faces a defining question: Does it have the strength to stand alone?

Military Might: A Formidable Base

Non-U.S. NATO’s military capacity is substantial. In 2024, its 2.1 million active-duty troops outnumber the U.S.’s 1.3 million and Russia’s unmet 1.5 million goal, per NATO data—a 1.6:1 edge, rising to 1.8:1 with 3.5 million reservists. Equipment bolsters this: 6,300 tanks (versus the U.S.’s 2,625), 25,000 armored vehicles, and a 3.5:1 artillery lead.

At sea, it fields 30 more surface ships and more submarines (mostly conventional) than the U.S., despite lacking supercarriers. In the air, U.S. bombers dominate, but European fighters outstrip Russia’s, aided by six E-7 AWACS planes acquired in 2023.

Could Europe Stand Alone? Musk’s NATO Exit Call Forces a Reckoning. (Photo Internet reproduction)

Economic Muscle: Resources to Tap

Economically, non-U.S. NATO’s $25 trillion GDP rivals the U.S.’s $28 trillion and dwarfs Russia’s projected $1.6 trillion. Its 2024 defense budget of $506.7 billion—equivalent to $750 billion in purchasing power parity (PPP), which adjusts for cost differences—trails the U.S.’s $967.7 billion.

Raising spending to 2.5% of GDP, as the UK plans, adds $137 billion, reaching $643 billion annually. At 5%, a U.S.-pushed target, it surges by $750 billion to $1.25 trillion—$1.8 trillion in PPP—exceeding the U.S. If America matched 5%, NATO’s total would hit $2.7 trillion, far beyond Russia’s reach.

Weak Links: Reliance and Fragmentation

Yet, capability isn’t readiness. The U.S. provides critical enablers—surveillance planes, tankers, satellites—that Europe lacks in scale. Without them, coordination across 30 nations falters. Poland’s 117,000 troop boost since 2014 strengthens the east, but moving e.g. Spanish forces to the Baltics or Poland without U.S. logistics is daunting.

Equipment varies widely—tanks from Leopard 2s to Turkey’s Altay, mismatched artillery shells—and ammunition depends on U.S. stockpiles. Nuclear deterrence rests on France’s tactical weapons and the UK’s submarine-based missiles; U.S. bombs in five nations (Belgium, Germany, Italy, Netherlands, Turkey) require U.S. approval.

Command, led by American officers since Eisenhower, assumes U.S. dominance. A shift—perhaps to France, eyeing nuclear sharing—may be needed. Unity wavers: Turkey, Greece, and Poland control two-thirds of tanks, but rivalries and hesitancy (e.g., Hungary) threaten cohesion. Luxembourg’s single satellite (a second planned) highlights uneven contributions.

Momentum: Spending and Markets Shift

Russia’s 2022 Ukraine invasion spurred action—21 non-U.S. states hit 2% GDP spending in 2024 (up from 9 in 2020, including Greece, UK, Estonia, Poland, Latvia, Lithuania, Romania, France, and Norway at 1.97%), with Poland and Estonia surpassing the U.S. percentage.

Belgium and Spain, at 1% in 2020, rose 30% but fell short. Since U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth’s February 12, 2025, Munich call for Europe to lead, markets reacted: Rheinmetall up 31%, Leonardo 26%, Saab 33%, Korea’s Hanwha 70%. U.S. firms dipped—Lockheed Martin down 11%, General Dynamics 7%—suggesting a turn from U.S. export controls.

Historical Echoes

Europe once stood taller. In 1914, its armies outmatched the U.S.; Britain’s navy reigned. World Wars reversed this—the U.S. rose via arms sales and 1917 entry, then dominated post-1945 with wealth and atomic power as Europe rebuilt.

The Bundeswehr hit 500,000 by the 1970s, but Cold War cuts (e.g., Germany’s 1990 treaty) and France’s 1960s nuclear push (e.g., Pluton carriers) didn’t erase U.S. reliance—until now, perhaps.

The Stakes: Unity and Ukraine

Voices rise: Germany’s Friedrich Merz, likely next chancellor, seeks “real independence” after U.S.-Musk election meddling; Poland’s Donald Tusk urges investment; France eyes nuclear options. Ukraine’s 150 artillery pieces and millions of drones in 2024 could bolster this—if allied, not abandoned.

A 2.5% GDP hike buys firepower; 5% rivals superpowers. Yet, economic sluggishness and divisions test resolve. Musk’s call, atop U.S. tariffs and UN votes siding with Russia (against 90+ nations, 65 abstaining), forces the issue: Europe can stand alone—if it wills it.

Could Europe Stand Alone? Musk’s NATO Exit Call Forces a Reckoning

Source link